Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Do overweight students have lower academic performance than their classmates? A pilot cross sectional study in a middle school in Tehran

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 4Email author
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders201413:87

  • Received: 27 July 2014
  • Accepted: 5 August 2014
  • Published:



Recently the special attention is given to psychological aspects of childhood obesity in overweight and obese children. The present pilot study aims to investigate the association of obesity and lipid profile with school performance among Iranian students.


69 middle school male students between the ages of 12 to 14 in 2009–2010 were studied. BMI was considered as the obesity index. The students’ Grade Point Average (GPA) along with their scores in math, geometry, calculus, English and absent rate were obtained as academic performance. Serum lipid profile was also assessed by a uniform method.


The GPA score, math and geometry scores were lower in overweight students in comparison with control group. The study of serum lipid profile indices showed no significant statistical association between serum lipid profile and school performance.


Our results support previous findings pointing out the negative effects of obesity on students’ school performance.


  • School Performance
  • Grade Point Average
  • Serum Lipid Level
  • Serum Lipid Profile
  • Poor School Performance


The prevalence of obesity among the school-aged children and adolescents has considerably increased in many countries from less than 10% in Russia and East Europe to more than 30% in the U.S [1].

There exist several studies regarding the medical co-morbidities of obesity in childhood and adolescence such as increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, hypertension, hypothyroidism, sleep disturbance [2]–[4]. It is noticeable that, recently there is a special attention to psychological aspects of childhood obesity and mental well-being in overweight and obese children [5],[6]. It has been shown that body image distortion in adolescents can cause distress and depression [7]. In addition, high BMI in term of being overweight is more prevalent among 6–10 old aged psychological dissatisfied children [8]. As a result, obesity related to distress and psychological problems in children and adolescents can be accompanied with unusual behaviors for weight reduction such as strict diet or drug use [9]. One of the most challenging psychological co-morbidities of childhood obesity is poor school performance; however, certain controversy remains in this regard. Many studies emphasized on positive relationship between obesity and poor school performance [10]–[13], while others has proved no significant correlation between these two issues [14],[15]. The majority of the existing studies have assessed the relation between Body Mass Index (BMI) and school performance without taking into account serum lipid level.

The aim of the present pilot study is to investigate the association of obesity and lipid profile with school performance among Iranian students considering the cultural diversity, ethnicity and educational characteristics in Iran.

Material and methods

Sampling technique

This cross-sectional study was conducted on the 69 school male students between the age of 12 to 14 in 2009–2010. They were studying in one of the private school in Tehran and they were matched socioeconomically (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of students






Std. deviation


Mean age of students





Time spent in school (Hours per day)





Time spent in school (Hours per week)





Average family income (USD per month)





Growth indices
















School performance


























Absent Rate





Serum Lipid Profile





















None of the students had experienced chronic serious diseases or medical problems influencing their school performance based on the medical records in school.

Weight measurement

The anthropometric measurements including weight and height were obtained while individuals wearing light cloths and no shoes. The students' weights were measured by a single trained physician at the beginning of the school year with the same wall-mounted stadiometer and a digital scale. The BMI was calculated as dividing body weight by squared height (kg/m2).

Afterwards, the results were compared with the BMI age-adjusted chart for males and the students with BMI values over the 85 percentile were considered as an overweight and those with BMI values over the 95 percentile as obese ones [16],[17].

Laboratory assessment

Early in the morning about 10 ml of venous blood samples, after 12 hours of fasting, were obtained from each student for biochemical tests. Lipid profile including triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were centrifuged for plasma concentration and they were restored at the same laboratory.

Evaluation of the academic performance

The students´ actual Grade Point Average (GPA) along with their score in math, geometry, calculus and English were obtained at the end of the academic year from the school records. Also the absenteeism rate was estimated for each student at the end of the educational year based on the school reports and it is considered as a one of the school performance indices.

Ethical approval

The project was conducted in accordance with declaration of Helsinki and the guidelines of the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. It was approved by the Ethical Board Committee of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute (EMRC). An informed consent was obtained from each participant and their parents before the investigation. No action was done without the informed consent of all participant and their parents.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 16. A descriptive data analysis was performed to assess the subjects’ socioeconomic status, academic performance, growth indices and laboratory variables. Student’s t-distribution or its nonparametric equivalent was used when necessary. Point estimation with a confidence interval of 95% was used to compare average grades of the participants and other quantitative variables between the study groups. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


A total of 69 participants with the mean age of 13.25 ± 31 years were enrolled in this pilot study. The BMI mean was 20.22 ± 3.9 kg/m2. In this study, 39 students were overweight and obese (BMI ≥ 85%) (Table 1).

The GPA score was lower in overweight student 18.8 ± 0.19 in comparison with the control group 19.06 ± 0.55 (p = 0.12). The same results were seen in math and geometry scores which were statistically lower in overweight students (18.04 vs. 19.1 for math and 18.44 vs. 19.15 for geometry) (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Obese students (BMI ≥ 95%) have lower grade in most subjects regarding math, geometry and English (Table 3).
Table 2

Comparison of school performance indices between overweight and control group


Mean (Std) in overweight (39)

Mean (Std) in control group (30)

P value


18.8 (0.193)

19.06 (0.557)



18.04 (2.456)

19.1 (0.845)



17.64 (3.891)

19.05 (1.032)



18.44 (1.728)

19.15 (0.881)



18.89 (1.502)

19.14 (0.798)


Absent Rate*

1.6 (2.362)

1.8 (1.857)


*Day per school year.

Table 3

Comparison of school performance indices between obese students and control group


Mean (Std) in obese students (14)

Mean (Std) in control group (55)

P value


18.5 (1.376)

19.05 (0.566)



17.08 (3.248)

18.98 (1.043)



16.43 (5.39)

18.88 (1.425)



17.72 (2.309)

19.09 (0.870)



18.37 (2.074)

19.18 (0.770)


Absent Rate*

1.75 (3.137)

1.74 (1.787)


*Day per school year.

Although the average grade point, in calculus and foreign language scores were lower in overweight and obese students, the differences were not statistically significant.

The absenteeism rate as an indicator of school performance was not substantially higher in overweight and obese students (p > 0.5).

The study of serum lipid profile indices obtained from 48 students showed no significant statistical association between serum lipid profile and school performance (Table 4).
Table 4

Comparison of school performance indices according to serum lipid profile







High TG group (10)

Normal TG group (32)

High CHOL group (21)

Normal CHOL group (21)

High LDL group (13)

Normal LDL group (29)

Low HDL group (3)

Normal HDL group (39)


18.92 (0.83)

18.87 (0.91)

18.75 (1.11)

19.01 (0.56)

19.07 (0.76)

18.8 (0.93)

19.08 (1.12)

18.86 (0.88)


18.75 (1.72)

18.54 (1.74)

18.38 (2.09)

18.8 (1.25)

19.07 (1.15)

18.37 (1.90)

18.79 (1.67)

18.58 (1.74)


18.72 (2.20)

18.49 (2.03)

18.26 (2.37)

18.83 (1.67)

19.11 (1.28)

18.29 (2.28)

18.83 (1.25)

18.52 (2.10)


18.77 (1.50)

18.6 (1.59)

18.5 (1.96)

18.78 (1.03)

19.03 (1.15)

18.46 (1.69)

18.75 (2.16)

18.63 (1.54)


19.03 (0.92)

18.9 (1.40)

18.77 (1.73)

19.09 (0.64)

19.16 (1.04)

18.83 (1.40)

19.66 (0.47)

18.87 (1.32)

Absent Rate*

1.2 (1.39)

2.1 (2.53)

1.95 (2.74)

1.85 (1.90)

1.69 (2.01)

2 (2.49)

0.33 (0.57)

2.02 (2.38)

*Day per school year.

Discussion and conclusion

To our knowledge, the present research is one of the first studies which demonstrated the influence of both BMI and serum lipid levels on school performance. Since prior study had run by Huang et al. in 2006 had examined the effect of both BMI and body fat index (according to foot bioelectric impedance) on academic performance [12] in which the cultural issues and ethnicity impact on the relation of obesity and school performance by student socioeconomic matching were considered.

Our results support previous findings pointing out the negative effects of obesity on school performance [10],[14]. Almost all the school performance indices measured in our study were lower in obese students; however the differences were only significant for mathematics and geometry. It is noteworthy that, in this study student school performance was not in relation to serum lipid levels. Several anthropometric measurement techniques such as the triceps skin fold have been applied o determine the overweight and obese individuals [18],[19]; besides, body mass index (BMI) is still the popular and accurate technique in this regard [20]–[22]. Although there are many methods of students’ school performance assessment such as IQ, grade rank, grade point average, days absent, visit to school nurse, enrollment in extracurricular activities, and plans to further schooling. The recent studies focused on the average grade in core academic subjects including Mathematics and English (foreign language) as a true proxy for school performance [12],[23]. According to these researches GPA, math, geometry, calculus and foreign language scores and also absenteeism rate were used as a school performance in our study.

There are some investigations affirming the inverse relationship between obesity and school performance [10],[14] similar to the recent systematic review and meta-analysis in 2010 which was in agreement with the correlation of high BMI and low IQ in school-aged children as a school performance proxy [24]. Furthermore, Hollar D et al. showed that the adaptation of certain anti-obesity interventions controlled not only the students’ BMI and blood pressure but also their school performance [25].

There are some potential explanation for reveres association between student grades average and BMI: firstly, as proven in previous studies there is a significant correlation between high BMI and depression [26],[27], that could strongly affect student performance. Noting that, a study in North Korea on 405 students confirmed that, psychological problems in overweight and obese student are the major cause of poor school performance rather than their body image [28]. In addition, the obese students are mostly less physically activate [29],[30] which lead them to experience the lower school performance compared with normal BMI students [31],[32].

Beside the investigations which confirmed the negative relationship between obesity and school performance, some authors have shown the controversial results. A study run by Louisa J et al. demonstrated no association between BMI values and school performance; however, it reported a negative influence of obesity on cognitive activities [33]. Interestingly, an Italian study showed the positive relation of obesity on school performance [34].

There are two main limitations in our study: first, recording system in governmental school in Iran doesn’t have a high quality due to a large number of incomplete health reports. Hence, it is not possible to rely on the school records in researches and there should be a supervisory mechanism to control it. Moreover, this study was a pilot study in one private school in Tehran hence depriving a large sample size.

According to the existing evidences obesity has a considerable impact on students’ school performance. In line with them. Our pilot study added new evidence which confirms these findings. But the key point is that such outcomes should be adjusted for each country with variety of a large scope of life style, diet, education system, and ethnicity that probably have some influences on this relation. So that, designing observational and interventional studies with greater sample size, while controlling other influential factors are recommended to validate the relation between obesity and school performance. After confirming this, the corrective interventions might be planned according to these factors in order to manage obesity in students and subsequently improve their school performance.


Authors’ Affiliations

Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shari’ati Hospital, North Kargar St, Tehran, Iran
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center (NCDRC), Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Foundation for education, research and services on Educational Medicine & School Health, Tehran, Iran
Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


  1. Karnik S, Kanekar A: Childhood obesity: a global public health crisis. Int J Prev Med 2012, 3(1):1.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. D'Onise K, Lynch J, McDermott R: Does an early childhood intervention affect cardiometabolic risk in adulthood? Evidence from a longitudinal study of preschool attendance in South Australia. Public Health 2012, 126(8):682–689. 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.04.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Park M, Falconer C, Viner R, Kinra S: The impact of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2012, 13(11):985–1000. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01015.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deere KC, Clinch J, Holliday K, McBeth J, Crawley EM, Sayers A, Palmer S, Doerner R, Clark EM, Tobias JH: Obesity is a risk factor for musculoskeletal pain in adolescents: Findings from a population-based cohort. Pain 2012, 153(9):1932–1938. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.06.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Russell-Mayhew S, McVey G, Bardick A, Ireland A: Mental Health, Wellness, and Childhood Overweight/Obesity. J Obes 2012, 2012: 281801. 10.1155/2012/281801View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Harriger JA, Thompson JK: Psychological consequences of obesity: Weight bias and body image in overweight and obese youth. Int Rev Psychiatry 2012, 24(3):247–253. 10.3109/09540261.2012.678817View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho JH, Han SN, Kim JH, Lee HM: Body image distortion in fifth and sixth grade students may lead to stress, depression, and undesirable dieting behavior. Nutr Res Pract 2012, 6(2):175–181. 10.4162/nrp.2012.6.2.175View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Salameh P, Barbour B: Obesity-associated distress in Lebanese adolescents: an exploratory look at a large cohort of students. EMHJ 2011, 17: 12.Google Scholar
  9. Alexius SL, Olinto MTA, Henn RL, Pattussi MP: The association between self perceptions of psychological well-being and overweight in Brazilian children. Matern Child Nutr 2012, 8(2):267–274. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00267.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Taras H, Potts-Datema W: Obesity and student performance at school. J Sch Health 2005, 75(8):291–295. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00040.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Florin TA, Shults J, Stettler N: Perception of Overweight Is Associated With Poor Academic Performance in US Adolescents. J Sch Health 2011, 81(11):663–670. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00642.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang TTK, Goran MI, Spruijt Metz D: Associations of Adiposity with Measured and Self Reported Academic Performance in Early Adolescence. Obesity 2012, 14(10):1839–1845. 10.1038/oby.2006.212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramaswamy R, Mirochna M, Perlmuter LC: The negative association of BMI with classroom effort in elementary school children. J Child Health Care 2010, 14(2):161–169. 10.1177/1367493509359222View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Abdelalim A, Ajaj N, Al-Tmimy A, Alyousefi M, Al-Rashaidan S, Hammoud MS, Al-Taiar A: Childhood Obesity and Academic Achievement among Male Students in Public Primary Schools in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2012, 21(1):14–19. 10.1159/000331792View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Baxter SD, Royer JA, Hardin JW, Guinn CH, Devlin CM: The Relationship of School Absenteeism With Body Mass Index, Academic Achievement, and Socioeconomic Status Among Fourth-Grade Children. J Sch Health 2011, 81(7):417–423. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00610.xView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Himes JH, Dietz WH: Guidelines for overweight in adolescent preventive services: recommendations from an expert committee. The Expert Committee on Clinical Guidelines for Overweight in Adolescent Preventive Services. Am J Clin Nutr 1994, 59(2):307–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Must A, Dallal GE, Dietz WH: Reference data for obesity: 85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (wt/ht2) and triceps skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1991, 53(4):839–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Canning H, Mayer J: Obesity: an influence on high school performance? Am J Clin Nutr 1967, 20(4):352–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luciano A, Livieri C, Di Pietro ME, Bergamaschi G, Maffeis C: Definition of obesity in childhood: criteria and limits. Minerva Pediatr 2003, 55(5):453–459. Epub 2003/11/11. Criteri e limiti della definizione di obesita nell'eta evolutivaPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM, Pietrobelli A, Goulding A, Goran MI, Dietz WH: Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2002, 75(6):978–985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Malina RM, Katzmarzyk PT: Validity of the body mass index as an indicator of the risk and presence of overweight in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 1999, 70(1):131s-136s.Google Scholar
  22. Dietz WH, Bellizzi MC: Introduction: the use of body mass index to assess obesity in children. Am J Clin Nutr 1999, 70(1):123s-125s.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sigfúsdóttir ID, Kristjánsson ÁL, Allegrante JP: Health behaviour and academic achievement in Icelandic school children. Health Educ Res 2007, 22(1):70–80. 10.1093/her/cyl044View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu Z, Han S, Cao X, Guo X: Intelligence in relation to obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2010, 11(9):656–670. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00656.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollar D, Lombardo M, Lopez-Mitnik G, Hollar TL, Almon M, Agatston AS, Messiah SE: Effective multi-level, multi-sector, school-based obesity prevention programming improves weight, blood pressure, and academic performance, especially among low-income, minority children. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2010, 21(2):93–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pine DS, Goldstein RB, Wolk S, Weissman MM: The association between childhood depression and adulthood body mass index. Pediatrics 2001, 107(5):1049–1056. 10.1542/peds.107.5.1049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sjöberg RL, Nilsson KW, Leppert J: Obesity, shame, and depression in school-aged children: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2005, 116(3):e389-e392. 10.1542/peds.2005-0170View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim B, Park MJ: The influence of weight and height status on psychological problems of elementary schoolchildren through child behavior checklist analysis. Yonsei Med J 2009, 50(3):340–344. 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.340View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hernandez B, Gortmaker S, Colditz G, Peterson K, Laird N, Parra-Cabrera S: Association of obesity with physical activity, television programs and other forms of video viewing among children in Mexico city. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999, 23(8):845. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800962View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Freedman DS, Wang J, Maynard LM, Thornton JC, Mei Z, Pierson R, Dietz WH, Horlick M: Relation of BMI to fat and fat-free mass among children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2004, 29(1):1–8. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802735View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Tremblay MS, Inman JW, Willms JD: The relationship between physical activity, self-esteem, and academic achievement in 12-year-old children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2000, 12(3):312–323.Google Scholar
  32. Coe DP, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malina RM: Effect of physical education and activity levels on academic achievement in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38(8):1515. 10.1249/01.mss.0000227537.13175.1bView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ells LJ, Hillier FC, Shucksmith J, Crawley H, Harbige L, Shield J, Wiggins A, Summerbell CD: A systematic review of the effect of dietary exposure that could be achieved through normal dietary intake on learning and performance of school-aged children of relevance to UK schools. Br J Nutr 2008, 100(5):927–936. 10.1017/S0007114508957998View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zoppi G, Luciano A, Vinco A, Residori P: Obesity in pediatrics: statistical analysis of school performance of obese children. Pediatr Med Chir 1995, 17: 559–562.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Heshmat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.