Investigating GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotype as the risk factor of diabetes type 2 retinopathy
© Dadbinpour et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 24 May 2013
Accepted: 12 August 2013
Published: 19 December 2013
Diabetes is one of the multifactorial disorders with genetics and environmental factors playing important role in its cause. In diabetes, the defects in cellular metabolism results in increasing free radicals. These radicals react with other vital cellular molecules which are responsible in diabetes side effects. Human glutathione S-transferases (GST) are a family of enzymes that catalyses conjugation of electrophilic substances with glutathione. In this research the deletion of two of the most important genes of this family; GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes was investigated as the risk factor for diabetes mellitus type II and one of its most important complications; retinopathy.
Material and methods
In this study deletion of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes in 57 diabetics’ patients with retinopathy and 58 diabetic peoples without retinopathy was examined. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and then multiplex PCR was performed following agarose gel electrophoresis to detect GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes. Data were analyzed with SPSS v16 software.
The results indicated that there was significant relationship between GSTM1 null genotype with retinopathy side effect of diabetes type 2. While there was no significant relationship between GSTT1 null genotypes with retinopathy in diabetes type 2.
Significant correlation between GSTM1 null genotype and retinopathy in this and other studies could indicate this fact that impair cellular metabolism result in increase free radicals and oxidative pressure. Therefore, GST null genotypes may result in decrease antioxidant capacity which causes side effects of diabetes. Considering the performance of different classes of GST null genotypes additional studies are required to confirm this study.
There are many genetics and environmental factors involve in multifactorial diseases such as heart diseases, diabetes, high blood pressure and cancer. Interaction of these factors and inheritance pattern is complex. Unlike monogenic disease the occurrence chance of these diseases cannot be predicted, but we can predict the incidence rate of the disease .
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is recognized as a worldwide public health problem due to the high medical and socioeconomic costs that result from complications associated with the disease. In general, T2DM is the most common metabolic and multifactorial disease in which both genetic and environmental factors are involved [1–3]. Diabetes is the latest step of a chronic and accelerating disorder which results from insulin resistance, decrease of functional pancreatic β cells and increase of glucose level. Approximately all of the T2DM patients are insulin resistance. Despite of numerous studies on insulin resistance, the main cause of it is still not known. It seems that post translation modification and mutations in the genes lead to defect in the cell signaling pathway which can result in insulin resistance . Several genes have been identified that are involved in the cellular pathway of glucose metabolism and storage. Defects in these genes can lead to diabetes or diabetes background. Among these genes are: Adiponectin[1, 2], PTPN1, GLUT4,2[5, 6], PAX4, HNF1B and PPARG. People with T2DM are at risk for several complications, including damage to the vascular system that leads to increase mortality . Many side effect of T2DM are cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. Diabetic retinopathy is one of the most severe complications that can cause blindness in patients. Blindness in diabetic patients is 25 times higher than non-diabetics . These complications could be due to the cellular metabolism leading to hyperglycemia and to the production of free radicals which combined with vital molecules result in various diseases.
The human glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of enzymes known to act in the body as the defense systems for neutralize free radicals. They play an important role in the detoxification of electrophiles by glutathione conjugation. For example, the function of the GST enzymes has traditionally been considered to be the detoxification of several carcinogens found in tobacco smoke. There is a wide range of electrophilic substrates both endogenous (e.g. by-products of reactive oxygen species activity) and exogenous (e.g. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) . GSTs are dimeric proteins that catalyze conjugation reactions between glutathione and tobacco smoke substrates, such as aromatic heterocyclic radicals and epoxides [13–15]. In addition to their role in phase II detoxification, GSTs also modulate the induction of other enzymes and proteins important for cellular functions, such as DNA repair. This class of enzymes is therefore important for maintaining cellular genomic integrity and, as a result, may play an important role in cancer susceptibility . The loci encoding the GST enzymes located on at least seven chromosomes. This multigene family divided in seven families (Alpha, Mu, Pi, Theta, Sigma, Zeta, and Omega) with functions ranging from detoxification to biosynthesis and cell signaling. Many of the GST genes are polymorphic, therefore, there has been substantial interest in studying the associations between particular allelic variants with altered risk of a variety of diseases. Several GST polymorphisms have been associated with an increased or decreased susceptibility to several diseases. Two of the important members of the GST family, named glutathione-s-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1) and glutathione-s-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1) have polymorphic homozygous deletion or null genotypes. Persons with homozygous deletions of either the GSTM1 or the GSTT1 locus have no enzymatic functional activity of the respective enzyme. This has been confirmed by phenotype assays that have demonstrated 94% or greater concordance between phenotype and genotype .
The GSTM1 locus has been mapped on chromosome 1p13.3, while the GSTT1 locus exists on chromosome 22q11.2. .
Recently in two different studies, the GSTT1 null genotype or both the GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes interacting with current-smoking status have been shown to be a genetic risk factor for the development of T2DM and its cardiovascular complications [17, 18].
In another study to investigate the associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), the results suggest that the GSTM1 null genotype is associated with T1DM protection and T1DM age-at-onset and that susceptibility to T1DM may involve GST conjugation .
Regarding the complications of diabetes, it has been shown that GSTT1 wild allele and GSTT1 wild/GSTM1 null genotype can be considered as risk factors for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in Slovak adolescents with T1DM .
Recently in one study reported from the Sinai area of Egypt on 100 T2DM patients and 100 healthy controls matched for age, gender and origin, the proportion of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes was significantly greater in diabetic patients when compared to controls. It was reported that there was a 3.17-fold increased risk of having T2DM in patients carrying both null polymorphisms compared to those with normal genotypes of these two genes (P = 0.009) .
To our knowledge, there was no study regarding GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes and diabetes retinopathy in Iranian population. In addition there is still debate about the results of limited number of researches in this regard in the other parts of the world. Therefore, in this study GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype as one of the genetics factors which may be related to the diabetes and its complications is investigated.
Materials and methods
In this study, diabetic patients have been selected from individuals referred to Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Yazd, Iran. Other factor such as age, sex, response to treatment and changes in hematological indices were extracted from patient records. Among patients with diabetes, 115 patients were selected who were 35 to 65 years old. Among them, 58 patients had no complication of diabetes (control group) and 57 patients had diabetes with retinopathy side effect (case group). The criteria of retinopathy were based on retinal examination by physician and finding neovascularization (based on the WHO index). The patients were selected by physician after examination. The research was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Primer sequences for GST multiplex PCR
5′-GAA CTC CCT GAA AAG CTA AAG G-3′
5′-GTT GGG CTC AAA TAT ACG GTG G-3′
5′-TTC CTT ACT GGT CCT CAC ATC TC-3′
5′-TCA CCG GAT CAT GGC CAG CA-3′
5′-GAA GAG CCA AGG ACA GGT AC-3′
5′-CCA CTT CAT CCA CGT TCA CC-3′
From 115 diabetes patients studied, 57 had retinopathy. Genotyping of GSTM1 revealed that among these 57 patients with retinopathy, 26 patients (45.6%) showed null genotype while 31 patients (54.4%) were positive for GSTM1 gene. Among 58 diabetic patients without retinopathy, 38 patients (65.5%) had null genotypes and 20 patients (34.5%) were positive for GSTM1 gene. The statistical analysis of GSTM1 gene deletion in controls (diabetes without retinopathy) (65.5%) and cases (diabetes with retinopathy) (45.6%) group indicates a significant relationship with df = 1, p-value = 0.04, and χ2 = 4.646.
Regarding GSTT1 genotypes, in 57 diabetics patients with retinopathy, 16 patients had null genotypes (28.1%) and 41 patients were GSTT1 positive (71.9%). While among 58 diabetic peoples without retinopathy, 10 patients had null genotypes (17.2%) and 48 patients were GSTT1 positive (82.8%).
The statistical analysis of GSTT1 gene deletion in controls (17.2%) and cases (28.1%) indicates no significant relationship with df = 1, p-value = 0.187, and χ 2 =1.94.
The statistical analysis of GSTT1 and GSTM1 interaction gene deletion in controls (77.59%) and cases (22.41%) indicates a weak significant relationship with df = 1, p-value = 0.052, and χ 2 =3.34.
Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases in nearly all countries; the number of people with diabetes is increasing due to population growth, aging, urbanization, and increasing prevalence of obesity and reduced physical activity.
Oxidative stress plays a major role in the pathogenesis of T2DM. β-cells are low in antioxidant factors such as glutathione peroxidise and catalase. Therefore, they are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress which may not only result from hyperglycemia associated with diabetes, but may also have an important causal role in β-cell failure and the development of insulin resistance and T2DM .
There are several complex mechanisms in human that protect the body against environmental agents including inappropriate dietary, UV radiation, smoking and free radicals which are produced from defective oxidation. The ability of human for metabolizing carcinogens (cancer causing substances) varies and people who have little ability to produce detoxification substance are at high risk of various diseases including diabetes and cancer. It seems that glutathione is important as a carcinogen neutralizing for free radicals [13, 14]. GST modulates the effects of various cytotoxic and genotoxic agents. GST genes encode a family of phase II enzymes (molecular mass 17–28 kD) that have major roles in catalyzing the conjugation of glutathione to a wide variety of hydrophobic and electrophilic substrates and carcinogens such as benzpyrene and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the role that polymorphisms in phase I and phase II detoxification enzymes may play in the etiology and progression of diseases. Polymorphisms reducing or eliminating these enzyme detoxification activities could increase a person’s susceptibility to diseases including T2DM . GSTs are multifunctional proteins that can function as enzymes catalyzing the conjugation of glutathione thiolate anion with a multitude of second substrates or as non-covalent binding proteins for a range of hydrophobic ligands [13, 14]. Peoples act in different ways to detoxification, this theory can describe the risk differences for various diseases include cancer and diabetes that cause by exogenous and endogenous agents. GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes expressed in many form in populations and people with null genotype have no active enzyme for detoxification [22, 23]. GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in Caucasian populations have frequencies of approximately 40–60% and 10–20%, respectively [19, 24–27]. We thus determined the polymorphism frequency for each of these enzymes in our study populations and looked for relationships between them and the clinical parameters in T2DM.
There are many studies dealing with GST polymorphism in various diseases, but only a few studies have addressed the role of GST polymorphisms in diabetes and T2DM complications. In the current study, we attempted to move beyond single gene polymorphism to two-gene polymorphisms that may help predict the susceptibility to the incidence of T2DM and their effect on T2DM complications in Yazd province population.
The statistical analysis between GSTT1 and retinopathy show no significant association (p = 0.187) that confirms the research of others [28, 29]. While t he statistical analysis between GSTM1 and retinopathy show significant association (p = 0.04) that confirm the effect of free radical in T2DM in other studies [30–34]. But is inconsistent with the only study that show GSTM1 null genotype might confer protection against retinopathy in Caucasians with T2DM .
Finally, the statistical analysis between GSTT1 and GSTM1 interaction in retinopathy show weak significant association (p = 0.052). To our knowledge there is no other research about the effect of GST genotype in side effects of diabetes (diabetes complication), therefore more researches with more cases is needed .
These results suggest that although the absence or deletion of detoxification pathway of GSTT1 has no significant effect on the side effects of T2DM but GSTM1 null genotype had significant relationship with diabetes retinopathy, indicating the role of detoxification of this genes in this regards.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.
We express our appreciation and thanks to the personnel of Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Yazd Clinical and Research Center for Infertility, and Dr Mohammad Reza Besharati, Dr Ahmad Zare, Dr Dehghan, Miss Azam Rasti, Miss Marzieah Arbabi, and Mr Mohammad Bagher Movahedi who have supported us in this study.
- Harati H, Hadaegh F, Saadat N, Azizi F: Population based incidence of type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors: results from a six-year cohort study in Iran. BMC public health 2009, 9: 186. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-186PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kadowaki T, Yamauchi T, Kubota N, Hara K, Ueki K, Tobe K: Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 2006,116(7):1784–1792. 10.1172/JCI29126PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geisler SA, Olshan AF: GSTM1, GSTT1, and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a mini-HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 2001,154(2):95–105. 10.1093/aje/154.2.95View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spencer-Jones NJ, Wang X, Snieder H, Spector TD, Carter ND, O’Dell SD: Protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene PTPN1: selection of tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms and association with body fat, insulin sensitivity, and the metabolic syndrome in a normal female population. Diabetes 2005,54(11):3296–3304. 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3296View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bogardus C, Lillioja S, Nyomba BL, Zurlo F, Swinburn B, Esposito-Del Puente A, Knowler WC, Ravussin E, Mott DM, Bennett PH: Distribution of in vivo insulin action in Pima Indians as mixture of three normal distributions. Diabetes 1989,38(11):1423–1432. 10.2337/diab.38.11.1423View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brüning JC, Winnay J, Bonner-Weir S, Taylor SI, Accili D, Kahn CR: Development of a novel polygenic model of NIDDM in mice heterozygous for IR and IRS-1 null alleles. Cell 1997,88(4):561–572. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81896-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PI, Chen H, Diabetes Genetics Initiative of Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, et al.: Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science 2007,316(5829):1331–1336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding EL, Song Y, Manson JE, Hunter DJ, Lee CC, Rifai N, Buring JE, Gaziano JM, Liu S: Sex hormone-binding globulin and risk of type 2 diabetes in women and men. N Engl J Med 2009,361(12):1152–1163. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804381PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halsall DJ, McFarlane I, Luan J, Cox TM, Wareham NJ: Typical type 2 diabetes mellitus and HFE gene mutations: a population-based case - control study. Hum Mol Genet 2003,12(12):1361–1365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Davis MD, Demets DL: The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102: 520–526. 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030398010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davidsom MB: Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis and Treatment. 4th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1998:267–311.Google Scholar
- Strange RC, Spiteri MA, Ramachandran S, Fryer AA: Glutathione-S-transferase family of enzymes. Mutat Res 2001,482(1–2):21–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grant SF, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Manolescu A, Sainz J, et al.: Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 2006,38(3):320–323. 10.1038/ng1732View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guengerich FP: Characterization of human cytochrome P450 enzymes. FASEB J 1992,6(2):745–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li R, Boerwinkle E, Olshan AF, Chambless LE, Pankow JS, Tyroler HA, et al.: Glutathione S-transferase genotype as a susceptibility factor in smoking-related coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis 2000, 149: 451–462. 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00483-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheikhha MH, Kalantar M1, Khalid Tobal KH, Liu Yin JA: Glutathione S-transferases null genotype in acute myeloid leukaemia. IJI 2005,2(3):141–151.Google Scholar
- Doney AS, Lee S, Leese GP, Morris AD, et al.: Increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes is associated with the glutathione S transferase theta-null genotype: a Go-DARTS study. Circulation 2005, 111: 2927–2934. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.509224View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hori M, Oniki K, Ueda K, Goto S, et al.: Combined glutathione S-transferase T1 and M1 positive genotypes afford protection against type 2 diabetes in Japanese. Pharmacogenomics 2007, 8: 1307–1314. 10.2217/146224188.8.131.527View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bekris LM, Shephard C, Peterson M, Hoehna J, Van Yserloo B, Rutledge E, et al.: Glutathione-s-transferase M1 and T1 polymorphisms and associations with type 1 diabetes age-at-onset. Autoimmunity 2005,38(8):567–575. 10.1080/08916930500407238View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vojtková J, Ďurdík P, Čiljaková M, Michnová Z, Turčan T, Babušíková E: The association between glutathione S-transferase T1 and M1 gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in Slovak adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 2013,27(1):44–48. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.07.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amer MA, Ghattas MH, Abo-ElMatty DM, Abou-El-Ela SH: Influence of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms on type-2 diabetes mellitus risk. Genet Mol Res 2011,10(4):3722–3730. 10.4238/2011.October.31.14View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saadat I, Saadat M: The glutathione S-transferase mu polymorphism and susceptibility to acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Lett 2000, 158: 43–45. 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00504-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu YH, Taylor J, Linko P, Lucier GW, Thompson CL: glutathione S-transferase μ in human lymphocyte and liver: role in modulating formation of carcinogene-derived DNA adduct. Carcinogenesis 1991, 12: 2269–2275. 10.1093/carcin/12.12.2269View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe T, Pakala R, Katagiri T, Benedict CR: Synergistic effect of urotensin II with midly oxidized LDL on DNA synthesis in vascular smood muscle cells. Circulation 2001, 104: 16–18. 10.1161/hc2601.092848View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saadat M, Sadeqi M, Farhud DD, Bahaoddini A: Heritability of blood pressure in an Iranian population. Iranian J Public Health 2001., 30: Nos. 1–2:81–82Google Scholar
- Setiawan VW, Zhang ZF, Yu GP, Li YL, Lu ML, Tsai CJ, Cordova D, Wang MR, Guo CH, Yu SZ, Kurtz RC: GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes and the risk of gastric cancer: a case–control study in a Chinese population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000,9(1):73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerting DM, Stampfer M, Haiman C, Hennakens CH, Kelsey K, Hunter DJ: Glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 ane GSTT1 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk. A prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev. 1998, 7: 1001–1005.Google Scholar
- Bid HK, Konwar R, Saxena M, Chaudhari P, Agrawal CG, Banerjee M: Association of glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1, T1 and P1) gene polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes mellitus in north Indian population. J Postgrad Med 2010,56(3):176–181. 10.4103/0022-3859.68633View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yildiz M, Karkucak M, Yakut T, Gorukmez O, Ozmen A: Lack of association of genetic polymorphisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene I/D and glutathione-S-transferase enzyme T1 and M1 with retinopathy of prematures. Genet Mol Res 2010,9(4):2131–2139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Afzali Z, Pilevaran AA, Maleki Rad AA: The compared of Oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients with healthy people. Hormozgan Medical Journal 2008, 2: 129–134.Google Scholar
- Norouzzadeh J, Keavanpejouh K: Indicators of oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes without side effects. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2006, 11: 22–28.Google Scholar
- Auta VR, Teddy T, Thiago M, Silva , Maria CA, Carlos AM: Is the GSTM1 null polymorphism a risk factor in primary open angle glaucoma? Mol Vis 2011, 17: 1679–1686.Google Scholar
- Dehghani M, Vahidi AR, Moin MR, Haghiroalsadat F, Sharafaldini M, Sheikhha MH: Investigating frequency of GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes null genotype in Men with varicocele and its association with the sperm parameters. Journal of Shaheed Sadoughi Uni of Med Sci 2012,20(3):350–360.Google Scholar
- Seifati SM, Parivar K, Aflatoonian A, Dehghani Firouz Abadi R, Sheikhha MH: No association of GSTM1 null polymorphism with endometriosis in women from central and southern Iran. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2012,10(1):23–28.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cilenšek I, Mankoč S, Petrovič MG, Petrovič D: GSTT1 null genotype is a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in Caucasians with type 2 diabetes, whereas GSTM1 null genotype might confer protection against retinopathy. Dis Markers 2012,32(2):93–99. 10.1155/2012/675628PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.