Skip to content


  • Review article
  • Open Access

An overview of the contribution of fatness and fitness factors, and the role of exercise, in the formation of health status for individuals who are overweight

Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders201211:19

  • Received: 12 August 2012
  • Accepted: 27 September 2012
  • Published:


Over the last half century there has been an epidemic of diminished health status induced by what seems as a concurrent rise in a population of individuals that are overfat. During the past few decades, the use of exercise has become a staple in the prevention and treatment options for the retarding the development of health issues pertaining to individuals who are overweight, overfatness or experience obesity. However, there are few studies and reviews look at the global issues surrounding the metabolic and hormone consequences of overfatness and the interaction of exercise with adiposity in humans developing the health status for the individual. This review offers an insight into our current understanding of health issues pertaining to metabolic and hormonal disruption related to overfatness and the treatment effect that exercise, especially resistance exercise, can have on impacting the health status, and overall well-being, for individuals who are overfat, regardless of body compositional changes leading toward a lessening of diseased state, and eventually a return to a normal health status for the individual.


  • Fatness
  • Fitness
  • Exercise
  • Health status


Over the past half-century, there has development of an epidemic of health related issues linked with the ever-increasing incidence of overfatness and a concurrent rise of obesity among Americans and populations worldwide [13]. During this same time there has been a number of research paths that have identified a number of contributing factors that might be possible explanations for the development this rapid increase proportion of obese individuals within the population, along with the associated health issues attributed to being obese or overfat. These explanations range from the commonly accepted point of view that an excessive intake of dietary calories with a limitation of dietary calories expended through activity over various periods of the individuals life, to changes in genetic and epigenetic regulatory factors, environmental stress and changes in hormonal responses to various physiological stressors, see Figures 1, 2 and 3 [15]. While it is true that a creation of a positive imbalance in dietary calories will lead to weight gain, this weight gain even if present in the form of fat mass does not by itself develop the “lifestyle diseases”, e.g., cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome, which have become the root of the health issues faced by individuals who are overfat.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The interrelationship between the various physiological and societal factors, that influence the development of the health behaviors for the individual that in turn impact the overall body morphology and eventual levels of overall health for any individual, regardless of level of adiposity (overfatness) or recognition of obesity.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Societal (combination of the familial and environment) factors that contribute the formation of the health behaviors that impact the development of body morphology, e.g., accumulation of fat or fat-free mass, and various factors of fitness which interact to comprise the overall health status for any individual.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Physiological (Genetic and Hormonal) factors that influence on cell physiology and the impact of cell physiology that contribute the formation of the fitness for the individual along with the development of body morphology, e.g., accumulation of fat or fat-free mass, which interact to comprise the overall health status for any individual.

Instead, the prevalence of health issues seems to be based more on changes in hormone and cytokine signaling (both in production and response) related to the changes in fat mass (even without being visibly obese or overfat) for the individual based on a variability of responses within a continuum of fatness phenotypes, see Figure 2 [68]. This variability in response necessitates that we be able to differentiate between individuals being “healthy” overweight and “unhealthy” overweight, i.e. overfat or obese, based on the impact of these hormonal changes within their normal physiological responses to stresses of daily living and therefore their overall health status [9]. Additionally, these “lifestyle diseases” that were once solely related to adult and elderly populations, has recently been seen with increasing frequency within the juvenile and adolescent populations, seemingly tied to the increase in the fatness, and a possible concurrent reduction in physical activity and healthy behaviors, of individuals within this population [1013]. As noted by Fogelholm [13] these change in healthy behaviors within juvenile and adolescent individuals may have long-lasting ramifications, as a reduction in beneficial early health behaviors tend to have a detrimental impact on both health status and activity level throughout one’s lifespan. And can result in changes in various modifications of genetic and epigenetic regulators systemically within the body, particularly at the level of skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissue, which tend to be involved in the changes to metabolic dysregulation at these same tissues of the body, Figure 1, and can possibility have an impact gamete formation, thus influencing future generations [11, 1416].

This idea of whole population fluctuation in genetic and epigenetic regulation, i.e. the “thrifty gene hypothesis” [15, 17] and “thrifty phenotype” [16], has been one of the more popular theories at attempting to explain the current rise in obesity related health issues, especially diabetes. While it may be tempting to lump obesity and overfatness (along with the associated health issues) on genetics, it should be noted at least two reviews on the subject one by Hill and Trowbridge [14] and a more recent paper by Veerman [18] concluded that the rate at which individuals within the population, as a whole, are becoming obese is at an indicated growth rate which could not easily be explained by a distinct genetic cause and that no single gene, or cluster of genes, would have the impact that we are currently seeing in diminished health status within the population of individuals who are overfat, or obese. Whether or not there is a distinct genetic cause for such an increase in the population that is over-fat, there is evidence to indicate distinct hormonal modifications, and thus hormone-genetic interactions, that occurs within the individual based on the increasing adiposity that can lead to the health issues associated with the person being over-fat or obese [5, 7, 1923].

This interaction between adiposity and hormone-gene interaction appears to cause convergence numerous physiological factors, especially energetic metabolic and immune function, which seems to ultimately determine an individual’s overall health status. This convergence of physiological factors has been labeled by Gruberg [24] and subsequently by McAuley & Blair [25] as the obesity paradox, or by Blair, Cheng, & Holder [26] and other authors [1, 2729] as “fat-but-fit” and “healthy obese”, which will be referred to henceforth as “fit-fat” and seems to be an individualized and related to the interaction fitness and fatness factors, see Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, along with a continuum of possible responses that formulate the health status for the individual regardless of level of visible adiposity, see Figure 6. In regard to this individualized response, it should be noted, that these fitness and fatness factors combine to establish one’s health status and not necessarily one’s observable level of adiposity, a common and popular misconception [4, 10, 13, 2533]. Thus indicating that simple visual examination of the person can often mislead both medical professional and research to an incorrect assumption regarding diseased status for an individual based on the observable level of adiposity.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Interaction between the factors of fitness and fatness the form an inverse relationship combining to eventually determine the overall health status for the individual, while the factors and components are identified as individual markers there is actually a highly elaborate web-like interaction between the various factors and is based on the premise of an inverse relationships between Total Fitness and Total Fatness where a high Total Fitness leads to improved overall health status (e. g., low disease state) and High Total Fatness leads to a diminished overall health status (e. g., high disease state).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Outline of the factors that act as components of health behaviors influencing the various factors of fitness and fatness determining the Total Fatness and Total Fitness of the individual and therefore the overall health status for an individual. LEGENED: % CHO:amount of carbohydrates in diet, % Fat: amount of fat in diet, % Protein: amount of protein in diet.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Examination of the continuum of the levels of fatness and fitness as they relate to an increase or decrease of relative risk for a diseased status for the individual’s health status regardless of observed level of adiposity. With each increase in level of physical activity, there appears to be an additive improvement to the reduction in the risk for disease state even with expression of high fatness. Note for fitness continuum* the more sedentary a person is they will perform only the minimal activities beyond those of daily living where as Inactive people only perform those activities of daily living. ** the difference between Active and Highly Active is # of day/week of activity.

While noting that there is this convergence between the factors of fitness and fatness, we have yet to definitively examine, especially for humans, how the development of health status is impacted by the fluctuations in adipokine and hormone interaction with peripheral tissues that has been linked with overfatness can lead to both the diseased state and eventual resolution of the diseased state, especially via increased physical activity particularly through the use of resistance exercise. While we have definitively shown through numerous animal models that this interaction exists with a relative dose response leading to the disease state and resolution of disease state, we have yet to make the same definitive claims for humans. Therefore the purpose of this review is to examine the response of hormones and adipokines acting at the peripheral tissues are related with the pathophysiology associated with overfatness and the changes seen in these signals with the employment of exercise (particularly resistance exercise) in the resolution of pathologies associated with overfatness leading to improvements in health status for the individual.

Role of adipose tissue and overfatness in the change of health status

For many years, it was considered that adipose tissue was an inert tissue for the body that was simply involved with the storage of fuel sources (lipids), from periods of feasting, for later use by the body during periods of fasting. Over the past decade, this idea of adipose is an inert tissue simply storing lipids for later use by the body has slowly changed, as researchers have come to a general conclusion that all adipose tissue is not the same and that differentiation of cells within the adipose tissues leads to a change in the behavior of adipose tissue in response to hormones and growth signals associated with many dilatory aspects of one’s health status throughout life, see Figure 7 [6, 19, 20, 3440]. This change in perspective has led to number of researchers asking what appears to be a pertinent question related to the current burden on the health care system based on what is called an epidemic of obesity. What exactly are the hormonal changes and pathophysiological issues related to increased and decreased levels of fatness that leads to diseases, and resolution of diseases, that many individual who are overfat, or obese, face on a daily basis? The initial response to this question began by determining that there is a differentiation of response by the adipose tissue to metabolic stressors and hormonal signaling that results in both hypertophication and hyperplasic changes to the tissue [23, 39, 41]. It seems to have been established that there are distinct changes in the regulation pulsitility of cytokine (either adipokine or interleukin) releases that have downstream regulation at the various peripheral tissues throughout the body, e.g. skeletal muscle, liver, see Table 1 [6, 19, 22, 23, 40, 4245]. From this initial response to the question regarding the role of adipose tissue in pathophysiology of “life style disease”, many researchers have begun to speculate about the role of upstream regulatory signals, from adipose tissue, on the downstream metabolic functions within peripheral tissues (e.g., skeletal muscle, liver and bone tissues), and the resulting dilatory changes in health status which tend to result in the accumulation of larger amounts of adipose tissue deposition within the responsive tissues of the body, reduction in cardiovascular function, a state of chronic inflammatory response, and reduced responsiveness to pancreatic hormones (i.e. insulin) and leptin both peripherally at the tissues while also centrally within the cerebral cortex, see Figure 7 [8, 22, 23, 30].
Figure 7
Figure 7

Interaction between increased caloric balance, reduced physical activity and exercise, increasing age, and/or increased level of psychosomatic stress on the hormonal influences for the development of hyper adiposity (i.e. over fatness and obesity) with reduction in lean body tissue and the subsequent downstream regulatory issues at the various tissues of body (e. g., adipocytes, skeletal muscle and liver) causing changes in production and secretion of deleterious cytokines, interleukins and adipokines that provides the basis for the eventual development of symptoms of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Note that the reduced anabolic hormones (e.g., growth hormone, testosterone, Thyroid hormones, IGF) in production, release and response at the peripheral tissues and increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal output (e.g. increased Epi/Norepi and Cortisol) leads to the downstream issues in series with the increase in visceral fatness from the simple increase in caloric balance (i.e. high dietary intake and low caloric expenditure).

Table 1

Summary of the key Adipokine/Cytokine associated with health related issues of over-fatness and obesity


Cell/Tissue Secreting

Tissue Influenced by Adipokine/Cytokine(Metabolic response to signal)

Impact of Over-fatness

Impact of Physical Activity

Adiponectin [46]


Skeletal Muscle (↑insulin sensitivity, ↓response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Liver (↑ insulin sensitivity, ↓response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Adipocytes (↑insulin sensitivity, ↓response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Cardiovascular Endothelial Cells (↓adhesion formation, ↓response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Visfatin [6, 22, 23, 43, 47]


Adipocytes (differentiation of cells)


Skeletal Muscle (↑ insulin sensitivity)

Liver (↑ insulin sensitivity)

Leptin [6, 22, 23, 40, 42, 43, 47, 48]


Cardiovascular Endothelial Cells (↑ adhesion formation, ↑ response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Adipocytes (↑ production and release IL-6, TNF-α)

Skeletal Muscle (↑insulin sensitivity, ↑ lipid metabolism, ↓response to IL-6, TNF-α)

Hypothalamus/Central Nervous

System (satiety, hunger response, indication of energy expenditure)

Resistin [20, 22, 4951]

A, M

Cardiovascular Endothelial Cells (↑ adhesion formation)*


Retinol Binding Protein-4 (RBP-4) [6, 43, 52, 53]


Skeletal Muscle (↓insulin sensitivity)

Liver (↓insulin sensitivity)

Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) [5, 6, 45, 5459]


Cardiovascular Endothelial Cells (↑ adhesion formation)

Skeletal Muscle (↓insulin sensitivity)

Liver (↓insulin sensitivity)

Interluekin-6 (IL-6) [5, 6, 20, 56, 6069]

M, A/M

Leukocytes (↑ activity and response)

Cardiovascular Endothelial Cells (↑ adhesion response)

Skeletal Muscle (↓insulin sensitivity, ↑inflammation response w/in tissues)

Liver (↓insulin sensitivity,↑inflammation response w/in tissues)

Chemerin [70]


Macrophage & Leukocyte (↑ activity and pro-inflammatory cytokine release)


Liver (↓insulin sensitivity,↑inflammation response w/in tissues)

Note that * indicates that mixed results in outcome of results with research involving human volunteers,$ animal studies indicate impact on insulin sensitivity not duplicated with human subjects, A indicates adipose tissue derived chemical, M indicates macrophage derived chemical, A/M indicates both adipose tissue and macrophage derived chemical, ↑ indicates an increase in production and release, ↓indicates an decrease in production and release, ↔ indicates no effect in production and release, and ? indicates unknown response.

While research has linked the altered release of, and response to, adipokines with many of the metabolic changes seen in the body with the accumulation of excessive fat [5, 20, 43, 71], there is unfortunately to date limited evidence to support a conclusive statement regarding the cause and effect relationship of adipokines with the excessive accumulation of body fat, with the exclusion of leptin and adiponectin sensitivity in adipose tissue for humans [8, 21, 48], or in the reduction anabolic hormones and the relative amounts of lean body tissues that are maintained. However, as shown Figure 7, there appear to be links between the accumulation of fat, with changes in the adipokine and hormone release, state of stress, and a correlative alteration of metabolic processes within the peripheral tissues. The degree of changes are especially noted in the systemic responses to insulin, leptin, and androgen hormones at the peripheral tissues of the body, and the chronic inflammatory state both within the cardiovascular system as well as at the peripheral tissues leading to the changes described in Tables 1 and 2 [6, 19, 20, 22, 23, 37, 71].
Table 2

Hormones associated with the development and maintenance of lean body tissue and the impact of adiposity and exercise on the production and release by endocrine glands


Endocrine Gland

Tissue Influenced by Hormone (Metabolic response to signal)

Impact of Over-fatness

Impact of Physical Activity (Acute)

Impact of Physical Activity (Chronic)

Testosterone/Adrenal Androgens [7282]

Testes Adrenal Cortex

Skeletal Muscle (hypertrophy, add contractile tissue)

↓ with associated ↑ in SHBG

↑ followed by ↓

↔, ↑,↓

Bone (add bone mass)

Adipose Tissue (break-down lipid)

Growth Hormone [8386]

Anterior Pituitary Gland

Liver (generate IGF, gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis)

↓ with associated ↑ in GHBP

↑ followed by ↓

↔, ↑,↓

Skeletal Muscle (hypertrophy, add non-contractile tissue)

Bone (add bone mass)

Adipose Tissue (break-down lipid for use as fuel source)

Insulin [32, 44, 54, 8796]


Skeletal Muscle (glucose, amino acid, lipid uptake and storage)

↑ (see Figure 8 for rational)

↑ during exercise bout, ↓following

Liver (glucose uptake and storage)

Adipose Tissue (glucose and lipid uptake and storage)

Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) [86, 97103]

Liver, Skeletal Muscle, Bone

Skeletal Muscle (hypertrophy, add non-contractile and contractile protein)

↓ with associated ↑ in IGF-BP

↑followed by ↓

↔, ↑,↓

Bone (add bone mass)

Cortisol [60, 84]

Adrenal Cortex

Skeletal Muscle (break-down of protein tissue, lipid break-down, decreased use of glucose)

↑(see Figure 8 for rational)

↑ during exercise bout, ↓following


Bone (break-down of protein matrix)

Liver (glycogenolysis)

Adipose Tissue (break-down lipid for use as fuel source)

Immune Cells (regulation of inflammatory response)

Triiodothyronine (T3) [104, 105]


Skeletal Muscle (regulation of metabolism and fuel source utilization)

↓ (Hypothyroidism associated with obesity unknown causal relationship)

↑ during exercise bout, ↓following 60 minutes of recovery


Bone (regulation of generation of protein matrix)

Adipose Tissue (regulation of lipid deposition and utilization)

Thyroxin (T4) [104, 105]


Skeletal Muscle (regulation of metabolism and fuel source utilization)

↓ (Hypothyroidism associated with obesity unknown causal relationship)

↑ following exercise bout, ↓following 120 minutes of recovery


Bone (regulation of generation of protein matrix)

Adipose Tissue (regulation of lipid deposition and utilization)

Note that ↑ indicates an increase in production and release, ↓indicates a decrease in production and release, ↔ indicates no effect in production and release, and ? Indicates unknown response.

There are additional associated pathologies within the cardiovascular system noted with overfatness, e.g., elevated levels of lipids and lipoproteins (dyslipidemia), due to the increased availability of fatty acids from both the diet and release of lipids from adipose tissue throughout the body. This change in lipid availability seems to have little impact on the metabolic use of fatty acids as a fuel source within the body of individuals who are obese, without a concurrent rise in adiponectin levels that is seen only with increasing levels of physical activity [33, 35, 46, 47]. This reduction in metabolic flexibility (noted by a rise in fatty-acid availability without concurrent utilization within the metabolically active tissues of the body) is commonly associated with raised levels in the measures of blood lipids (e.g., total cholesterol measures of HDL, LDL, and vLDL, and triglyceride) levels throughout the cardiovascular system [21, 35, 46, 47]. Additionally, metabolic inflexibility, dyslipidemia along with the associated increase in atherosclerosis plaques and hypertension, appear to be linked with changes in release of adipokines (e.g., adiponectin, leptin, resistin) and cytokines (e.g., TNF- α, IL-6) that are linked to the increased development of endothelial adhesion and reduction of arteriole compliance, see Table 1 and Figure 7, leading to further cardiovascular health issues for the individual throughout their lifespan [6, 12, 20, 71].

Lastly, there is also growing evidence that for individuals with higher levels of adiposity there is a reduction in the production of sex (androgen) hormones and a concurrent rise in the carrier proteins for the various sex hormones (SHBG) [34, 38, 72, 106]. This association between increase in SHBG and reduced free androgen hormones seems to be linked with both the accumulation of fat mass, and reduction of fat-free mass, and has led to a speculation of a link between the changes in available androgens and the associated epidemic rise of metabolic diseases within both juvenile and adolescent populations, as well as adult and elderly population, that express overfatness or are obese, for purported impact see Table 2 and Figure 7 [3, 34, 38, 72, 106].

All of which leads many to speculate as to a possible role of adipose tissue and circulating adipokines dysregulation and the inability to respond to circulating anabolic and steroid hormones (e.g., insulin, adrenal androgens, growth hormone, estrogens, glucocorticoids, progesterone, testosterone) throughout the time that an individual expresses overfatness.

Role of fitness, exercise and physical activity behaviors in the change of health status

Fitness, just like fatness, develops through a combination of many facets of one’s lifestyle (behavior) related to the innate qualities of the person such as their genetic and hormonal components establishing metabolic responses to various stresses throughout one’s lifespan, see Figures 1, 4, 5 and 6 [6, 19, 20, 107]. The idea of fitness has been evolving over the past few decades as various lines of research has investigated how each component of physiological function leads into one’s overall fitness. Any discussion of fitness must begin with attempting to define a very complex, and ever evolving, issue as to what is exactly meant by fitness. Fitness, defined here, is a multifaceted dimension of tissue and organism function that is composed of the interactions of the cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, nervous, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems that lead to one’s ability to complete and recover from all tasks of daily living and recreational activities with a minimal level of chronic immune response and inflammatory biomarkers.

As it relates to the individuals who are overfat or obese, any improvement of fitness come from the change in multiple metabolic processes that are linked with release of, and response to, various adipokines, cytokines, and hormones at the peripheral and central tissues of the body, see Tables 1 and 2. While more fatness generally leads to a greater release in deleterious adipokines and cytokines from adipose tissue, improving fitness through increased physical activity (especially resistance exercise) leads to the greater responsiveness to anabolic hormones (e.g., insulin, androgens, growth hormone, IGF, and thyroid hormones) and advantageous adipokines and cytokines (e.g., leptin, adiponectin, and IL-10), along with a concurrent reduction in the release of the deleterious adipokines and cytokines (e.g., resistin, adiposin, TNF- α, IL-6 and RBP-4) and hormones (e.g., cortisol) [7, 8, 21, 48, 49, 71, 83]. These changes in responses to the circulating milieu of hormones, cytokines and adipokines following physical activity tend regulate the metabolic activity of tissues (e.g., skeletal muscle, bone, liver and adipose tissue) which leads to quantifiable improvements in overall health status. This improvement is seen most dramatically in the return to metabolic flexibility, reduction in the chronic state of inflammation found within both the peripheral tissues (e.g., skeletal muscle and adipose) and the cardiorespiratory system for the individual that can lead to a concurrent the increase in lean tissue and reduction in fat mass if chronically employed [4, 19, 37, 43, 83, 87, 88, 108110].

From these responses, there appears to be a continuum of response with improved fitness being an acute response to the bout of exercise, see Figures 4 and 5, and the desired morphological changes from increased physical activity appear as a chronic response that is the continuation of initial acute changes for the individual leading to improved metabolic function and hormonal responses to a number of physiological stressors, see Figure 8 [83, 88, 107, 110113]. Because of these continuums of events, which can appear after just a single bout of exercise we must ask, how does improvement in fitness affect one’s health status if there is a large degree of fatness? Given all of the health issues surrounding the accumulation of fat mass, just how exactly does improving one’s fitness level counter-act these detrimental health issues? While the principles of exercise as it relates to a change in healthy individuals have been well documented, a question remains as to how exactly does increased fitness counteract the accumulation of fat mass that takes months and years to develop into the overfatness that negatively affects one’s health status?
Figure 8
Figure 8

Interaction between caloric restriction, increased physical activity and exercise, and a reduction in the level of psychosomatic stress on the hormonal influences for the reduction of hyperadiposity (i.e. overfatness and obesity) and increase in lean body tissue, leading to the improvement in subsequent downstream regulatory issues at the various tissues of body (e.g., adipocytes, skeletal muscle and liver) causing changes in production and secretion of deleterious cytokines, interleukins and adipokines that provides the basis for the eventual resolution of symptoms of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Note that the improved response in anabolic hormones (e.g., growth hormone, testosterone, Thyroid hormones, IGF) in production, release and response at the peripheral tissues and decreased response at the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) output (e.g. increased Epi/Norepi and Cortisol) leads to the resolution of previous downstream issues in series with the decrease in visceral fatness from the simple caloric restriction leading the resolution of overfatness, metabolic syndromes and cardiovascular disease. Note the ? on the Endurance Exercise pathway as mixed evidence indicates that increasing anabolic hormone release with Resistance Exercise is known while it is still in doubt as to the extent of changes following Endurance Exercise in regards to the release of anabolic hormones.

There is a growing body of evidence to support that most of the body compositional changes that we associate with the change in fitness status comes from the chronic changes to adiponectin, as much as the changes noted to the anabolic hormones, which both have positive fluctuations with increased physical activity for those individual who are overfat or obese [8, 54, 114]. While others [28, 32, 54, 60, 8789, 115117] have indicated that the primary metabolic adaptations (especially the reduction in insulin resistance) leads to increased metabolic flexibility for skeletal muscle with improvements in insulin and leptin sensitivity throughout the body, and normalization of hormone concentrations. In this regard it is the associated with this change in leptin metabolism is a reduction of both pro-inflammatory adipokines and cytokines (e.g., resistin, leptin, RBP-4, CRP and TNF- α) along with reduction resting levels of cortisol that appears to lead to the resolution of deleterious health issues for the individual who is overfat or obese [6, 12, 20, 50, 71, 118].

Treatments and treatment effects

It is this idea of changes in hormonal signaling that has lead to the idea of a treatment effect for exercise at reducing the impact of fatness and increasing the impact of fitness on the development of the individuals health status. Unfortunately there are a number of factors that have hindered our approach to determine the true treatment effect of exercise for those individuals who are overfat or obese. This hindrance is noted in two distinct areas of research, first is our overall ability to quantify and qualify a change in fitness status within the overfat populations stems from the misconceptions of how the general medical population (and some researchers) measures and discusses issues of fitness and fatness and secondly an inability among researchers to appreciate the overall complexity of how exercise (especially the difference in response to endurance and resistance training) truly functions in many of our research models of treatment for the pathology of overfatness and obesity [113, 119].

Given the deleterious effects of health that accumulating high amounts of adipose tissues leads to, there has been a concerted effort by the medical and public health communities to counteract the rise of individuals who are overfat or obese within the general population not only in the US but worldwide [3]. Through this effort, there has developed the assumptive position for treatment options that revolve around the simple development of a negative dietary caloric balance that is encouraged to be developed either through dietary calorie restriction within the diet, or an increased dietary calorie expenditure through physical activity, or a combination of the two [29, 30, 120124].

While many physicians and health professionals support the use of dietary caloric restriction to reduce body mass, any reduction in fat mass may not be linked with any increase in fitness for the individual. This due to the fact that a development of a negative dietary caloric imbalance through dietary modifications is only one component in a very complex interaction of factors that influence the health status for any individual, especially for those who find themselves as being over-fat, see Figures 7 and 8, as weight gain or loss is a systemic process and never limited to a single tissue (e.g., adipose tissue). In opposition to simple dietary changes leading to weight reduction and a normalization of health issues, researchers have shown that physical activity (as examined primarily through endurance training methods) of at least moderate intensity (50-70% of individual’s VO2max associated HR) leads to both positive adaptations with the cardiovascular system (e.g., reduction of vascular inflammation, cholesterol, glucose and triglycerides levels), an increase in fatty-acid oxidation, and hormonal levels (e.g., improved insulin and leptin sensitivity, reduced cortisol and inflammatory signals) independent of, and prior to, anybody compositional changes that might result from chronic training [8, 3032, 44, 54, 87, 108, 114, 122, 125127]. As described in Figure 8, this differential response may be linked with the additive response of hormonal adaptations that are seen with exercise and physical activity that are not normally seen with simple dietary caloric restriction. Which is supported by a number of researchers, indicating that when caloric restriction is combined with exercise there is a differential reduction of body mass versus the changes seen simple caloric restriction, and when resistance exercise is incorporated into the treatment a retardation of the total loss of lean body mass [30, 109, 111, 120124, 128130]. In further support of this position, when resistance exercise is incorporated into the behavioral treatment programs, not only is the reduction in mass primarily fat mass, but there resounding effect of the use of exercise on the overall improvement in measures of fitness, e.g., resting blood pressure and cholesterol levels, and abnormal blood sugar levels or metabolic disease for the individual [28, 32, 54, 90, 108, 117, 118, 121, 131].

Unfortunately for the individuals who are overfat or obese, regardless of how effective any exercise program might be, the self-efficacy of follow through to any program seems to be quite low. This phenomenon has been noted, in private conversations with a number of physicians, and by Eriksson [132] in his review of exercise treatments of individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, that up to 90% of self-started exercise programs by overweight individuals are terminated within 12-months of initiation of said program. While there are number of factors that are involved in the aspect of exercise attrition, one key factor appears to the innate attraction to a mode of exercise for the individual and psychological rewards obtained from exercising. Based on the psychological components of exercise selections, rate beneficial adaptations, and general attraction towards distinct patterns of exercise, there seems to be support for the speculation that the individuals who are overfat may have an innate willingness to self-select toward resistance exercise [30, 88, 129, 132, 133]. Based on the speculative propensity for, and possible innate drive toward selecting resistance exercise, resistance training may by the simple attrition of all factors provide the greatest benefit for the overfat or obese population. This benefit should be especially true if the exercise regimen incorporates principles of a periodized resistance exercise program that is readily used in exercise prescription for the healthy fit and athletic populations [134, 135], and even more so when resistance exercise is utilized concurrently with the moderate-to-moderately-high intense endurance training [49, 90, 109, 115, 121, 131, 136, 137].


Because of the interactions between a variety of factors that contribute to the development and maintenance of body composition it is overly simplistic to continue to use the dietary notion of dietary caloric restriction to reduce body mass as a means to alleviate the epidemic diminishment in health status associated with overfatness and obesity. However, it is the combination of factors, both fitness and fatness, within overlapping continuums that formulates one’s overall health status and that there appears to be a greater benefit for the individual from increasing the level of physical activity rather than the absolute level of fitness. While improving fitness and reducing fatness may lead to an improvement in health status that may or may not make the person as “healthy” as a fit active person; it is speculated here, if physical activity is continued at a high to moderate intensity (especially with a periodized resistance training program) may eventually serve as a treatment medium for total resolution of health-related issues that have arisen from the period of life with overfatness.

However, in order to better understand the complexity of the issue, future research needs to look at the involvement of anabolic and steroid hormone dysregulation within the scope of movement towards and away from disease status as it relates to the accumulation of adiposity. This dysregulation may involve the disruption of pathways that should allow for the deposition of lean body tissue and normal energetic metabolism but may also become involved with the alteration of the genetic machinery of the adipose tissue leading to higher cell turnover, limit apoptosis and a greater differentiation of adipose cells exacerbating the health issues for someone who is over-fat or obese. One of the biggest culprit in this cascade toward a disease state may be the reduction in free anabolic hormones and response at the tissues through regulation of receptors that while seen in the aging population may in fact be at play with the young but over-fat population that can lead to the deleterious health issues that are counteracted by increased physical activity and regimented exercise programs. Lastly, research needs to compare the relative benefits that are attainable from use of resistance versus endurance training, to date we were only able to find three such studies utilizing human subjects. Additionally, we need to complete examinations, not only look at the physiological benefits and improvements in health status but also at the psychology of exercise selection and adherence of the exercise program of choice (or prescription) for individuals who are over-fat or obese.



The author would like to acknowledge the MCC noon-institute for providing the forum for development of idea that became this manuscript along with William Kraemer, Brett Comstock, and Jay Hydren for clarification of argument and directions for images contained within this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Mathematics, Department of Science, Science and Health Careers, PO Box 1046, MS 29, 60 Bidwell Street, Manchester, CT 06045-1046, USA


  1. Letter HH: Is it okay to be fat if you're fit? Research suggests that physical activity may cancel out some of the bad effects of being overweight or obese. Harv Health Lett 2005, 30: 4.Google Scholar
  2. McHugh MD: Fit or fat? A review of the debate on deaths attributable to obesity. Public Health Nurs 2006, 23: 264–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Overweight and Obesity. 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Farrell SW, Fitzgerald SJ, McAuley PA, Barlow CE: Cardiorespiratory fitness, adiposity, and all-cause mortality in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42: 2006–2012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kong AP-S, Chan NN, Chan JC-N: The role of adipocytokines and neurohormonal dysregulation in metabolic syndrome. Current Diabetes Reviews 2006, 2: 397–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastard J-P, Maachi M, Lagathu C, et al.: Recent advances in the relationship between obesity, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Eur Cytokine Netw 2006, 17: 4–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans RM, Barish GD, Wang Y-X: PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nat Med 2004, 10: 355–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hara T, Fujiwara H, Nakao H, Mimura T, Yoshikawa T, Fujimoto S: Body composition is related to increase in plasma adiponectin levels rather than training in young obese men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005, 94: 520–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Nevill AM, Bate S, Holder RL: Modeling physiological and anthropometric variables known to vary with body size and other confounding variables. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005, 41: 141–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenmann JC: Aerobic fitness, fatness and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr 2007, 96: 1723–1729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill RA, Margetic S, Pegg GG, Gazzola C: Leptin: its pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998, 22: 765–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jago R, Drews KL, McMurray RG, et al.: Fatness, fitness, and cardiometabolic risk factors among sixth-grade youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42: 1502–1510.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fogelholm M: How physical activity can work? Int J Pediatr Obes 2008, 3(Suppl 1):10–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill JO, Trowbridge FL: Childhood obesity: future directions and research priorities. Pediatrics 1998, 101: 570–574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell BC, Cajigal A: Diabetes: energetics, development and human evolution. Medical Hypotheses 2001, 57: 64–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Watve MG, Yajnik CS: Evolutionary origins of insulin resistance: a behavioral switch hypothesis. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7: 61.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neel JV: Diabetes mellitus: a "thrifty" genotype rendered detrimental by "progress"? Am J Hum Genet 1962, 14: 353–362.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Veerman JL: On the futility of screening for genes that make you fat. PLoS Med 2011, 8: e1001114.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Berggren JR, Hulver MW, Houmard JA: Fat as an endocrine organ: influence of exercise. J Appl Physiol 2005, 99: 757–764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fantuzzi G: Adipose tissue, adipokines, and inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005, 115: 911–919. quiz 920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nannipieri M, Bonotti A, Anselmino M, et al.: Pattern of expression of adiponectin receptors in human adipose tissue depots and its relation to the metabolic state. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007, 31: 1843–1848.Google Scholar
  22. Tilg H, Moschen AR: Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2006, 6: 772–783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Trayhurn P, Beattie JH: Physiological role of adipose tissue: white adipose tissue as an endocrine and secretory organ. Proc Nutr Soc 2001, 60: 329–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gruberg NJW L, Waksman R, Fuchs S, Deible R, Pinnow EE: The impact of obesity on the short-term and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: The obesity paradox? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 39: 578–584.Google Scholar
  25. McAuley PA, Blair SN: Obesity paradoxes. J Sports Sci 2011, 29: 773–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS: Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33: S379-S399. discussion S419–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Duncan GE: The "fit but fat" concept revisited: population-based estimates using NHANES. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010, 7: 47.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gerson LS, Braun B: Effect of high cardiorespiratory fitness and high body fat on insulin resistance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38: 1709–1715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hainer V, Toplak H, Stich V: Fat or fit: what is more important? Diabetes Care 2009, 32(Suppl 2):S392-S397.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kay SJ: Fiatarone Singh MA. The influence of physical activity on abdominal fat: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 2006, 7: 183–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hawley JA: Exercise as a therapeutic intervention for the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2004, 20: 383–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawley JA, Lessard SJ: Exercise training-induced improvements in insulin action. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2008, 192: 127–135.Google Scholar
  33. American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), American Diabetes Association (ADA): Exercise and type 2 diabetes: American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42: 2282–2303.Google Scholar
  34. Baer HJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Dorgan JF: Adiposity and sex hormones in girls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16: 1880–1888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dahm CC, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Jakobsen MU, et al.: Adipose tissue Fatty Acid patterns and changes in anthropometry: a cohort study. PLoS One 2011, 6: e22587.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsubara M, Maruoka S, Katayose S: Inverse relationship between plasma adiponectin and leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese women. Eur J Endocrinol 2002, 147: 173–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Müssig K, Remer T, Maser-Gluth C: Brief review: Glucocorticoid excretion in obesity. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Sørensen K, Aksglaede L, Munch-Andersen T, et al.: Sex hormone-binding globulin levels predict insulin sensitivity, disposition index, and cardiovascular risk during puberty. Diabetes Care 2009, 32: 909–914.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Arner E, Westermark PO, Spalding KL, et al.: Adipocyte turnover: relevance to human adipose tissue morphology. Diabetes 2010, 59: 105–109.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Maya-Monteiro CM, Bozza PT: Leptin and mTOR: partners in metabolism and inflammation. Cell Cycle 2008, 7: 1713–1717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bunnell BA, Estes BT, Guilak F, Gimble JM: Ch.12: Differentiation of Adipose Stem Cells. Adipose Tissue Protocols. 2nd edition. 2008, 155–171.Google Scholar
  42. Dyck DJ: Leptin sensitivity in skeletal muscle is modulated by diet and exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005, 33: 189–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dyck DJ: Adipokines as regulators of muscle metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism. Physiologie appliquée, nutrition et métabolisme 2009, 34: 396–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nassis GP, Papantakou K, Skenderi K, et al.: Aerobic exercise training improves insulin sensitivity without changes in body weight, body fat, adiponectin, and inflammatory markers in overweight and obese girls. Metab Clin Exp 2005, 54: 1472–1479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Solomon SS, Odunusi O, Carrigan D, et al.: TNF-alpha inhibits insulin action in liver and adipose tissue: A model of metabolic syndrome. Horm Metab Res 2010, 42: 115–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Baratta R, Amato S, Degano C, et al.: Adiponectin relationship with lipid metabolism is independent of body fat mass: evidence from both cross-sectional and intervention studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89: 2665–2671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Teoh H, Strauss MH, Szmitko PE, Verma S: Adiponectin and myocardial infarction: A paradox or a paradigm? Eur Hear J 2006, 27: 2266–2268.Google Scholar
  48. Friedman JM, Halaas JL: Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 1998, 395: 763–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones TE, Basilio JL, Brophy PM, McCammon MR, Hickner RC: Long-term exercise training in overweight adolescents improves plasma peptide YY and resistin. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009, 17: 1189–1195.Google Scholar
  50. Gualillo O, González-Juanatey JR, Lago F: The emerging role of adipokines as mediators of cardiovascular function: physiologic and clinical perspectives. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2007, 17: 275–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fargnoli JL, Sun Q, Olenczuk D, et al.: Resistin is associated with biomarkers of inflammation while total and high-molecular weight adiponectin are associated with biomarkers of inflammation, insulin resistance, and endothelial function. Eur J Endocrinol 2010, 162: 281–288.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Choi KM, Kim TN, Yoo HJ, et al.: Effect of exercise training on A-FABP, lipocalin-2 and RBP4 levels in obese women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009, 70: 569–574.Google Scholar
  53. Viswakarma N, Jia Y, Bai L, et al.: Coactivators in PPAR-Regulated Gene Expression. PPAR Res 2010. pii: 250126Google Scholar
  54. Kim ES, Im J-A, Kim KC, et al.: Improved insulin sensitivity and adiponectin level after exercise training in obese Korean youth. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007, 15: 3023–3030.Google Scholar
  55. Buford TW, Cooke MB, Willoughby DS: Resistance exercise-induced changes of inflammatory gene expression within human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009, 107: 463–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Coppack SW: Pro-inflammatory cytokines and adipose tissue. Proc Nutr Soc 2001, 60: 349–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kern PA: Potential role of TNFalpha and lipoprotein lipase as candidate genes for obesity. J Nutr 1997, 127: 1917S-1922S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sethi JK, Hotamisligil GS: The role of TNF alpha in adipocyte metabolism. Semin Cell Dev Biol 1999, 10: 19–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zderic TW, Hamilton MT: Physical inactivity amplifies the sensitivity of skeletal muscle to the lipid-induced downregulation of lipoprotein lipase activity. J Appl Physiol 2006, 100: 249–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mathur N, Pedersen BK: Exercise as a mean to control low-grade systemic inflammation. Mediators Inflamm 2008, 2008: 109502.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bruunsgaard H: Physical activity and modulation of systemic low-level inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 2005, 78: 819–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Eder K, Baffy N, Falus A, Fulop AK: The major inflammatory mediator interleukin-6 and obesity. Inflamm Res 2009, 58: 727–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Febbraio MA, Hiscock N, Sacchetti M, Fischer CP, Pedersen BK: Interleukin-6 is a novel factor mediating glucose homeostasis during skeletal muscle contraction. Diabetes 2004, 53: 1643–1648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Helmark IC, Mikkelsen UR, Børglum J, et al.: Exercise increases interleukin-10 levels both intraarticularly and peri-synovially in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther 2010, 12: R126.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Holmes AG, Watt MJ, Febbraio MA: Suppressing lipolysis increases interleukin-6 at rest and during prolonged moderate-intensity exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 2004, 97: 689–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Petersen AMW, Pedersen BK: The anti-inflammatory effect of exercise. J Appl Physiol 2005, 98: 1154–1162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Petersen AMW, Pedersen BK: The role of IL-6 in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise. J Physiol Pharmacol 2006, 57(Suppl 10):43–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sacheck JM, Cannon JG, Hamada K, Vannier E, Blumberg JB, Roubenoff R: Age-related loss of associations between acute exercise-induced IL-6 and oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006, 291: E340–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Trujillo ME, Sullivan S, Harten I, Schneider SH, Greenberg AS, Fried SK: Interleukin-6 regulates human adipose tissue lipid metabolism and leptin production in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89: 5577–5582.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Bozaoglu K, Bolton K, McMillan J, et al.: Chemerin is a novel adipokine associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Endocrinology 2007, 148: 4687–4694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Izquierdo M, Ibañez J, Calbet JAL, et al.: Cytokine and hormone responses to resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009, 107: 397–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Abate N, Haffner SM, Garg A, Peshock RM, Grundy SM: Sex steroid hormones, upper body obesity, and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002, 87: 4522–4527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Guay AT: The emerging link between hypogonadism and metabolic syndrome. J Androl 2009, 30: 370–376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Katabami T, Kato H, Asahina T, et al.: Serum free testosterone and metabolic syndrome in Japanese men. Endocr J 2010, 57: 533–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Kicman AT: Biochemical and physiological aspects of endogenous androgens. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2010, 25–64. 10.1007/978–3-540–79088–4_2Google Scholar
  76. Kupelian V, Hayes FJ, Link CL, Rosen R, McKinlay JB: Inverse association of testosterone and the metabolic syndrome in men is consistent across race and ethnic groups. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008, 93: 3403–3410.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kupelian V, Page ST, Araujo AB, Travison TG, Bremner WJ, McKinlay JB: Low sex hormone-binding globulin, total testosterone, and symptomatic androgen deficiency are associated with development of the metabolic syndrome in nonobese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91: 843–850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Saad F, Gooren LJ: The role of testosterone in the etiology and treatment of obesity, the metabolic syndrome, and diabetes mellitus type 2. J Obes 2011., 2011: pii: 471584Google Scholar
  79. Smilios I, Pilianidis T, Karamouzis M, Parlavantzas A, Tokmakidis SP: Hormonal responses after a strength endurance resistance exercise protocol in young and elderly males. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2007, 28: 401–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tremblay MS, Copeland JL, Van Helder W: Effect of training status and exercise mode on endogenous steroid hormones in men. J Appl Physiol 2004, 96: 531–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Vikan T, Schirmer H, Njølstad I, Svartberg J: Low testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels and high estradiol levels are independent predictors of type 2 diabetes in men. Eur J Endocrinol 2010, 162: 747–754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Vingren JL, Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Anderson JM, Volek JS, Maresh CM: Testosterone Physiology in Resistance Exercise and Training: The Up-Stream Regulatory Elements. Sports Med 2010, 40: 1037–1053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Jørgensen JOL, Rubeck KZ, Nielsen TS, et al.: Effects of GH in human muscle and fat. Pediatr Nephrol 2010, 25: 705–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA: Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med 2005, 35: 339–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rasmussen MH: Obesity, growth hormone and weight loss. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010, 316: 147–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Suarez P, Jennings R, Evers N, Brabant G: GH/IGF-I regulation in obesity–mechanisms and practical consequences in children and adults. Horm Res Paediatr 2010, 73: 153–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Bell LM, Watts K, Siafarikas A, et al.: Exercise alone reduces insulin resistance in obese children independently of changes in body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 92: 4230–4235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Shaibi GQ, Cruz ML, Ball GDC, et al.: Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescent males. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38: 1208–1215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Miller JP, Pratley RE, Goldberg AP, et al.: Strength training increases insulin action in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men. J Appl Physiol 1994, 77: 1122–1127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Cuff DJ, Meneilly GS, Martin A, Ignaszewski A, Tildesley HD, Frohlich JJ: Effective exercise modality to reduce insulin resistance in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003, 26: 2977–2982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. De Filippis E, Alvarez G, Berria R, et al.: Insulin-resistant muscle is exercise resistant: evidence for reduced response of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes to exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008, 294: E607–614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Goran MI, Shaibi GQ, Weigensberg MJ, Davis JN, Cruz ML: Deterioration of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in overweight Hispanic children during pubertal transition: a longitudinal assessment. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006, 1: 139–145.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Klimcakova E, Polak J, Moro C, et al.: Dynamic strength training improves insulin sensitivity without altering plasma levels and gene expression of adipokines in subcutaneous adipose tissue in obese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91: 5107–5112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Pørksen N, Hollingdal M, Juhl C, Butler P, Veldhuis JD, Schmitz O: Pulsatile insulin secretion: detection, regulation, and role in diabetes. Diabetes 2002, 51(Suppl 1):S245–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Thevis M, Thomas A, Schänzer W: Insulin. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2010, 209–226. 10.1007/978–3-540–79088–4_10Google Scholar
  96. Thong FSL, Dugani CB, Klip A: Turning signals on and off: GLUT4 traffic in the insulin-signaling highway. Physiology (Bethesda) 2005, 20: 271–284.Google Scholar
  97. Brick DJ, Gerweck AV, Meenaghan E, et al.: Determinants of IGF1 and GH across the weight spectrum: from anorexia nervosa to obesity. Eur J Endocrinol 2010, 163: 185–191.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Crown AL, He XL, Holly JM, Lightman SL, Stewart CE: Characterisation of the IGF system in a primary adult human skeletal muscle cell model, and comparison of the effects of insulin and IGF-I on protein metabolism. J Endocrinol 2000, 167: 403–415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Mohan S: The anabolic effects of GH/IGF system on bone. Curr Pharm Des 2004, 10: 2577–2592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Kostek MC, Devaney JM, Gordish-Dressman H, et al.: A polymorphism near IGF1 is associated with body composition and muscle function in women from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010, 110: 315–324.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Kraemer RR, Kilgore JL, Kraemer GR, Castracane VD: Growth hormone, IGF-I, and testosterone responses to resistive exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992, 24: 1346–1352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Kraemer WJ, Aguilera BA, Terada M, et al.: Responses of IGF-I to endogenous increases in growth hormone after heavy-resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 1995, 79: 1310–1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Veldhuis JD, Keenan DM, Bailey JN, Adeniji AM, Miles JM, Bowers CY: Novel relationships of age, visceral adiposity, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein concentrations to growth hormone (GH) releasing-hormone and GH releasing-peptide efficacies in men during experimental hypogonadal clamp. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94: 2137–2143.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Ciloglu F, Peker I, Pehlivan A, et al.: Exercise intensity and its effects on thyroid hormones. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2005, 26: 830–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Nannipieri M, Cecchetti F, Anselmino M, et al.: Expression of thyrotropin and thyroid hormone receptors in adipose tissue of patients with morbid obesity and/or type 2 diabetes: effects of weight loss. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009, 33: 1001–1006.Google Scholar
  106. Mohr BA, Bhasin S, Link CL, O'Donnell AB, McKinlay JB: The effect of changes in adiposity on testosterone levels in older men: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Eur J Endocrinol 2006, 155: 443–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Hood DA, Irrcher I, Ljubicic V, Joseph A-M: Coordination of metabolic plasticity in skeletal muscle. J Exp Biol 2006, 209: 2265–2275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, et al.: Anti-inflammatory effect of exercise training in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome is dependent on exercise modalities and independent of weight loss. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2010, 20(8):608–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Cauza E, Hanusch-Enserer U, Strasser B, et al.: The relative benefits of endurance and strength training on the metabolic factors and muscle function of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005, 86: 1527–1533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Haddad F, Adams GR: Selected contribution: acute cellular and molecular responses to resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 2002, 93: 394–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Koster A, Visser M, Simonsick EM, et al.: Association between fitness and changes in body composition and muscle strength. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010, 58: 219–226.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Lee DC, Sui X, Blair SN: Does physical activity ameliorate the health hazards of obesity? Br J Sports Med 2009, 43: 49–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Bacon L, Aphramor L: Weight science: evaluating the evidence for a paradigm shift. Nutr J 2011, 10: 9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Lee S, Kuk JL, Davidson LE, et al.: Exercise without weight loss is an effective strategy for obesity reduction in obese individuals with and without Type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol 2005, 99: 1220–1225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Maiorana A, O'Driscoll G, Goodman C, Taylor R, Green D: Combined aerobic and resistance exercise improves glycemic control and fitness in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2002, 56: 115–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Sieverdes JC, Sui X: Lee D-c, et al. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in a prospective study of men. Br J Sports Med 2010, 44: 238–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boulé NG, et al.: Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007, 147: 357–369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Simpson KA, Singh MAF: Effects of exercise on adiponectin: a systematic review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008, 16: 241–256.Google Scholar
  119. Booth FW, Laye MJ: Lack of adequate appreciation of physical exercise's complexities can pre-empt appropriate design and interpretation in scientific discovery. J Physiol (Lond) 2009, 587: 5527–5539.Google Scholar
  120. Hayes C, Kriska A: Role of physical activity in diabetes management and prevention. J Am Diet Assoc 2008, 108: S19–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Kerksick C, Thomas A, Campbell B, et al.: Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women. Nutrition & metabolism 2009, 6: 23.Google Scholar
  122. Larson-Meyer DE, Redman L, Heilbronn LK, Martin CK, Ravussin E: Caloric restriction with or without exercise: the fitness versus fatness debate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010, 42: 152–159.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Strasser B, Spreitzer A, Haber P: Fat loss depends on energy deficit only, independently of the method for weight loss. Ann Nutr Metab 2007, 51: 428–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Williams PT: Health effects resulting from exercise versus those from body fat loss. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33: S611–621. discussion S640–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Ormsbee MJ, Choi MD, Medlin JK, et al.: Regulation of fat metabolism during resistance exercise in sedentary lean and obese men. J Appl Physiol 2009, 106: 1529–1537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Venables MC, Jeukendrup AE: Endurance training and obesity: effect on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40: 495–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Carey DG: Quantifying differences in the "fat burning" zone and the aerobic zone: implications for training. J Strength Cond Res 2009, 23: 2090–2095.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Hainer V, Toplak H, Mitrakou A: Treatment modalities of obesity: what fits whom? Diabetes Care 2008, 31(Suppl 2):S269–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. McGuigan MR, Tatasciore M, Newton RU, Pettigrew S: Eight weeks of resistance training can significantly alter body composition in children who are overweight or obese. J Strength Cond Res 2009, 23: 80–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Sgro M, McGuigan MR, Pettigrew S, Newton RU: The effect of duration of resistance training interventions in children who are overweight or obese. J Strength Cond Res 2009, 23: 1263–1270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Avila JJ, Gutierres JA, Sheehy ME, Lofgren IE, Delmonico MJ: Effect of moderate intensity resistance training during weight loss on body composition and physical performance in overweight older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010, 109: 517–525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Eriksson JG: Exercise and the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. An update. Sports Med 1999, 27: 381–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Brock DW, Irving BA, Gower B, Hunter GR: Differences emerge in visceral adipose tissue accumulation after selection for innate cardiovascular fitness. Int J Obes 2011, 35(2):309–312.Google Scholar
  134. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA: Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004, 36: 674–688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM): American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009, 41: 687–708.Google Scholar
  136. Clark JE: Examining Matched Acute Physiological Responses to Various Modes of Exercise in Individuals Who Are Overweight. Journal of strength and conditioning research /National Strength & Conditioning Association 2010, 24: 2239–48.Google Scholar
  137. Irvine C, Taylor NF: Progressive resistance exercise improves glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2009, 55: 237–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar


© Clark; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.